Why Collaborative Process is Better Than Litigation

Why Collaborative Process is Better Than Litigation

Why Collaborative Process is Better Than Litigation


In today's world, numerous legal disputes arise between parties from time to time. Traditionally, parties have found themselves facing litigation in courtrooms that could take years to resolve. However, over the years, collaborative processes have gained prominence as an effective way to resolve disputes. In this blog post, we'll delve into why the collaborative process is better than litigation. If you're looking for a collaborative law attorney in Orlando, FL, contact Ilvento Law today for more information.

 

1. Collaborative Process Preserves Relationships

Litigation can often be acrimonious, with parties raising voices and pointing fingers. The heated exchanges and arguments can ruin the existing relationships between parties. Luckily, the collaborative process offers a chance to preserve relationships. Parties work together to find an amicable resolution, and this helps parties maintain cordial relationships that were present before the dispute. Additionally, when children and families are involved, the collaborative process ensures that the well-being of the children and family relationships are the priority.

2. Collaborative Process Is Cost-Effective

Litigation can be an expensive process, with parties incurring significant legal fees and court costs. The collaborative process, on the other hand, tends to be more cost-effective. Parties engage in negotiations and collaborative problem-solving sessions, which reduce the amount of time and money spent in court. This cost-effectiveness is beneficial for both parties, who can use the saved money for other things that matter to them.

3. Collaborative Process Is Faster

Litigation can take years to resolve, and even then, parties may not get favorable judgments. In comparison, the collaborative process tends to be faster. Parties engage in collaborative problem-solving sessions and negotiations, which ensure a resolution is found in a reasonable amount of time. This is particularly useful in situations where parties are in dire need of a resolution, for example, during a divorce or child custody battle.

4. Collaborative Process Allows For More Control

When parties litigate, they surrender control of the outcome to the court. The judge has the final say and can make decisions that are unfavorable to both parties. The collaborative process, on the other hand, allows parties to have more control over the outcome. Both parties have a say in the resolution, and they work together to achieve a fair and equitable result.

5. Collaborative Process Is Private

Litigation is often a public affair. Courtrooms are open to the public, and court records are accessible to anyone who wants to view them. The collaborative process, on the other hand, is private. Parties engage in confidential negotiations in private settings, which protects their privacy and avoids any unwarranted public scrutiny.

 

Conclusion

In conclusion, there are several advantages to the collaborative process compared to litigation. It preserves relationships, is cost-effective, faster, allows for more control and is private, among other benefits. If you're looking for a collaborative law attorney in Orlando, FL, contact Ilvento Law today for more information. Our experienced attorneys will help you find an amicable resolution to your dispute.

To Top